Heb 13:17 states clearly that ‘leaders’ (I think broader NT context would establish these as the elders/pastors) are to keep watch over the souls of their congregation, knowing that God will call them to account for how well they did this. Serious reflection on this text, its implications and how this fits with so much else in the biblical description of ministry would revolutionize pastoral ministry today- and probably lead to renewal in the church. That is a grand claim, but I am convinced that it is true.
A pastor’s primary task is to watch over, guard, nurture the souls of his people. We are to be instruments of God’s grace helping His people to persevere. In Baxter’s words, “It is our duty to help others attain eternal glory” (14). It is this aim which guides and animates our preaching, our counseling, our visiting of the sick and bereaved, our work and weddings and funerals. In all of this we are to be shepherding the souls of our people, acting as God’s steward directing them in the path of life, pointing out pitfalls of their specific situation, sympathizing with weakness but confronting sin and urging them on toward the celestial city. This is pastoral ministry. Anything short of this does not deserve the name.
This task is not less than but so much more than preaching good sermons. It is this view of pastoral ministry which makes it clear that the pastor must walk among his people (see Video Church discussion). Note these quotes from Baxter:
“I fear most those ministers who preach well, and who are unsuited to the private nurture of their members.” (7) Amen! What does this say about our impersonal approach to preaching?
“For he that does not pray for his people will not preach powerfully to his people.” (18)
“We should know completely those in our flock.” (71)
“A faithful pastor should have his eyes on them all. He should labor to know each person’s natural temperament, their situations, and the context of their affairs in the world. A pastor should be aware of the company they live with and deal with, so that he may know where their temptations lie. Thus he knows speedily, prudently, and diligently how to help them.” (76)
“But when a minister does not know his own people, he is not able to really minister
to them.” (107)
“By means of such personal ministry we come to be better acquainted with each one’s spiritual state. Then we know better how to watch over them and relate to them.” (107)
Does this not challenge our status quo? But is this not right? Sure I know it is difficult. Do not disregard it as idealistic. We dare not do so. Let us face squarely the crushing nature of the task, and let that drive us to our knees where we might learn humility and beg God for wisdom, courage and grace to fulfill our task.
- page numbers for Baxter quotes taken from the edition edited by James Houston
2 comments:
Dr. Van Neste,
Thanks for making Baxter required reading for your Pastoral Ministries class. It is a profound book that has shaped my view of pastoral ministry.
I have a question about Baxter's philosophy of ministry. I am in complete agreement with his proposals, but I am wondering if you can flesh out a bit more what this would be in our day. I have heard some say that no one has yet definitively shown what Baxter's model looks like in the contemporary context. To be more specific, do you think that pastors/elders today should make a goal of visiting personally with each of their church members at least once each year? Are there other ways of practicing such personal oversight? Do you have any thoughts?
Great question Matt. I do think this is possible today. It is difficult, and I have not perfected it but I do think it is possible and feasible. At the moment the elders I serve with and I work through the membership list (a portion each week) and talk with each other about how each one is doing, challenges, updates, has anyone talked with them lately, etc. This is being a great help to us. It is not yet to a formal meeting with each one once a year, but it is a start, and it helps keep before us who we have and have not spent time with recently (at least one of us).
I think one crucial thing is shared oversight. If one of us has followed up with someone then that is sufficient.
If we are willing to invest the time and labor to think and do, we can accomplish the goal. We must resist the ideas of those who so willingly dismiss these things as 'mere idealism.'
Post a Comment