Wainscott’s questions and Gordon’s answers are provocative and helpful. Here is one excerpt from Gordon.
There probably is a relationship between not reading poetry and tolerating contemporary worship music. If one reads poetry, one comes to appreciate language that is well-crafted; in the process, one becomes less accepting of language that is poorly crafted. So, most contemporary worship makes me cringe not only musically but also lyrically (not to mention theologically). The commercial forces in our culture want us to be content with pablum, because it is easier to produce pablum than really good stuff. Those commercial forces have pushed us away from demanding disciplines such as reading verse (where there is almost no room for significant commercial profit); and in the process, we as a culture no longer notice inferior art, because we are surrounded by it.Check out the interview. This is a book I will be watching for.
2 comments:
I agree with the comment. I have been thinking about this lately. When I look at the difference between the old hymns and the contemporary choruses it is like the diffenence between the art of the Italian Masters and a Jackson Pollock; like the difference between Rodan's "Thinker" and a car covered in bottle caps. There is a huge difference in the musical and lyrical artistry of the two.
I notice that all the "Contemporary Worship" songs are copyright. Commercalisation!
Post a Comment